Good day to thee!
trueishcolours:

chubbroyalty:

ultrafacts:

For more posts like this, follow Ultrafacts

I have always needed to know this!

Been watching for ages and I still don’t understand. It’s kind of beautiful how much I don’t understand.

trueishcolours:

chubbroyalty:

ultrafacts:

For more posts like this, follow Ultrafacts

I have always needed to know this!

Been watching for ages and I still don’t understand. It’s kind of beautiful how much I don’t understand.

tardisbro:

iamnotover:

hungoverandhard-up:

robynjaja:

This is one of the most adorable comics I’ve ever read

I’ve been waiting for this to pop back up on my dashboard.. we are way too hard on ourselves.

YES, EVERYONE!! Read this! You’re wonderful!

This is exactly what I needed today

cool cyberpunk tip

edwardspoonhands:

helioscentrifuge:

ranyakumo:

when referring to people, use “glitch” instead of “bitch”. call them glitches. say theyre being glitchy. not only do you get to avoid using a misogynistic slur, you can also imply that their negativity is an anomaly in the web grid of your life and thus needs to be patched

I REALLY LIKE THIS ACTUALLY

…I’m down…

lunalovegouda:

freemindfreebody:

emmammo:got

Learn how to braid your hair like the ladies in Game of Thrones.

Not for the show, I only care for braids.

*heavy breathing*

grumpychangeling:

Government agents from A Vague Yet Menacing Agency were in the back, watching. (x)

this is — yes

justeraaron:

i have no regrets

ilikesallydonovan:

nethenclawpuff:

zferolie:

shota-purinsu:

zorobro:

linzthenerd:

theguilteaparty:

crippledcuriosity:

itsfondue:

Isn’t it nice how people twist their religious scripture to suit their weds but when it’s used against them it’s suddenly not okay

I talked to a monk about this quote once (we have mutual friends, and he came to a New Year’s Eve party at my shared art studio). He said this isn’t even talking about homosexuality. That the bible never actually says homosexuality is wrong. What that passage means is this:

Women were treated as subservient and it that you shouldn’t treat other men as subservient, like they are beneath you. It is not talking about homosexuality. If it was, it would say it outright since the bible lists other things outright.

I take the word of a monk who have studied the bible extensively more than a self proclaimed Christian.

The above text, I would like to point out is from the point of view of this translation of the original Hebrew. I spoke with my cousin’s rabbi on the matter and his response was different, saying that it was a mistranslation. See, the true translation says that a man shall not lie with another in the bed of a woman, which is to say, the Hebrews had a shit ton of rules about when a man was or was not allowed in a woman’s bed and private quarters (including, if she didn’t want you there, you weren’t allowed there. Hebrew women were also allowed to divorce their husbands and the image of the ‘oppressive Hebrew people’ is an image that was propogated by Christianity which, historically speaking, doesn’t treat the Jewish people too well and liked to paint them as being rather barbaric and backwards and cultish with their traditions, which, another piece of fun info, their traditions were one of the main reasons why the Jewish people were less likely, in medieval times, to die of the plague. Because washing your hands and avoiding the dead and vermin and the like was a lot of help. Of course the Christians persecuted them for not dying but that’s another matter. I’m sidetracked). So the verse is literally saying ‘Don’t fuck in some lady’s bed because that’s just goddamn rude’

Also, whenever a Christian brings the book of Leviticus up, you should feel free to point out that these are rules that were given to make the Hebrew people prepared for when the son of God came to earth. In Christianity, it’s believed the son of God was Jesus. So by following the rules set in Leviticus or pushing them as things we should follow, they’re saying that Jesus was not the son of God, and that Jesus did not, in fact, die for our sins. Jewish people believe, in their faith, that the son of God hasn’t yet been born, so many choose to follow these rules.

Most people of course roll their eyes when I explain the translation of the verse (full breakdown found here) but it’s always fun to point out the nature of the rules in Leviticus and the implications of following them. 

I’m a theology student and I am on the verge of crying because of how accurate this commentary is. Historical context is simultaneously the most interesting and most important part of interpreting any texts. 

Most religious people seem to base their beliefs on things that are severely mistranslated. I wish they would do their research before using the bible for hate.

I studied theology extensively and was going to become a theologist until I switched majors. The above commentary is 100% accurate and what I try to stress in a lot if conversations with Bible Thumpers.

Jesus also affirms the homosexual relationship between the Roman Centurion and his “slave”. The particular Greek word used to refer to this special slave was “pais”. Greek language studies and contexts show that a “pais” was a male love slave. Regular slaves were called “doulos”. The Centurion makes this distinction clearly when he asks Jesus to heal his slave (pais), and then to prove his status he tells Jesus that his slaves (doulos) go when he tells them to. But this slave (pais) was special. He was the Centurion’s lover.

Hearing this, Jesus was so amazed he says he had not found ANYONE ELSE who had such great faith. He then blesses the Centurion and heals his male lover.

Matthew 8:5-13

THIS IS WHAT THE BIBLE REALLY TEACHES ABOUT SAME SEX COUPLES.

In short, the English adaptation is a mistranslated farce.

every time this shows back up on my dash I learn  something new

Hang on, what, seriously? So Jesus basically performed some kind of blessing ceremony on a same sex couple?! HOW THE BLOODY HELL ARE YOU SUPPOSED TO BE AGAINST MARRIAGE EQUALITY IF JESUS BASICALLY PERFORMED ONE WAY BACK WHEN AND YOU CALL YOURSELF A CHRISTIAN.

And this, ladies and gentlemen and variations thereof, is why you can’t interpret the bible literally. It was written for a completely different culture (and those translations that the fundamental Christians love so much were translated ages ago, i.e. also in a different culture) and without taking this into account, you get it wrong. Furthermore, this whole “the bible was written by the holy ghost” argument so often cited by extremist Christians is rubbish. The gospel of Luke begins with the words “dear Teophilus, I know that you’re interested in the history of Christianity, so I tried to find as much stories as I could find about Jesus’ life on earth and wrote them down for you”. How you can go from this to “we have to interpret the bible literally because it was written by God himself” is beyond me.

jessandhersillyblog:

battlereadyprince:

monk-of-space:

a motorcycle gang made up of ancient bisexual norse monarchs: the bikings

I JUST REALIZED THAT THIS POST IS 4 PUNS IN ONE OH MY GODDDDD

I’m not usually a pun person but wow